indexer.ink

← All comparisons

Ormi vs Envio

How Ormi and Envio differ on type, speed, chains and developer experience.

OrmiEnvio
TypeManaged serviceOpen-source framework
How it worksManaged subgraph hosting that’s Graph-compatible, with GraphQL/REST/SQL access — positioned as a drop-in for teams leaving The Graph’s hosted service.The HyperIndex framework with TypeScript handlers, powered by HyperSync (a Rust query engine up to 2000× faster than RPC). Wildcard + multichain from a single indexer; self-host via Docker or use the hosted service. Graph-compatible migration.
ChainsMajor EVM85+ EVM (+ any via RPC)
SpeedFastFastest
CodingSubgraphTypeScript
Best forManaged Graph-compatible migrationFast EVM indexing + great DX

Ormi

  • Fully managed, zero infra
  • Graph-compatible (easy migration)
  • GraphQL, REST and SQL
  • Newer / smaller
  • Paid managed service

Envio

  • Independently benchmarked fastest
  • HyperSync up to 2000× faster than RPC
  • TypeScript + wildcard + multichain
  • EVM-focused (non-EVM via RPC only)
  • Younger ecosystem than The Graph

Bottom line

Pick Ormi for managed graph-compatible migration; pick Envio for fast evm indexing + great dx.