How Goldsky and Subsquid (SQD) differ on type, speed, chains and developer experience.
| Goldsky | Subsquid (SQD) | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Managed service | Decentralized protocol |
| How it works | Two products: Subgraphs (instant, Graph-compatible GraphQL, zero maintenance) and Mirror (stream raw on-chain data straight into Postgres or your warehouse, no code). | An open SDK plus a decentralized data lake (the SQD Network): batch-fetch on-chain data fast, transform in TypeScript, and serve. Covers EVM and non-EVM in one framework. |
| Chains | 150+ | 100+ (EVM + non-EVM) |
| Speed | Real-time | Very fast |
| Coding | No-code / GraphQL | TypeScript |
| Best for | Managed subgraphs + data pipelines | Fast multichain incl. non-EVM |
Pick Goldsky for managed subgraphs + data pipelines; pick Subsquid (SQD) for fast multichain incl. non-evm.